Reason Foundation's blog had a post earlier this month noting that even giddy central-planning fanboys and groupies aren't squealing unrestrained glee for Massachusetts-style universal health coverage.
Just after publication of the article, "Massachusetts Faces Costs of Big Health Care Plan," in the March 15 New York Times, the left-wing Institute for America's Future issued a "scathing indictment of the Massachusetts' plan," said Reason.org's Shikha Dalmia. "Among its findings":
Of course, the glaring policy imperfections of Massachusetts' "TonySopranoCare" have hardly dulled fanatical progressive ambitions for universal government-run care.
The IAF's prescription for the shortcomings, inefficiencies, failures and injustices symptomatic of the system devised by former Gov. Mitt Romney is to empower really smart federal bureaucratic capos to "ensure equitable distribution of the cost of care among government, individuals and employers, based on ability to pay," according to the Institute report.
At the same time, having the U.S. government "jump into the insurance business with both feet and compete directly with private companies by offering its own Medicare-style health plan for Americans," predicts Dalmia, is really just "a quick way of killing the private insurance industry and paving the way for nationalized health care."
But then, American progressives always do tend to spell "reform" the same way, concludes Dalmia:
"E-U-R-O-P-E."